What I found most interesting about the houses today was what they seemed to be trying to accomplish. I know that, for me, there are certain things that I look for in a house. And, despite the range in sizes and prices of today's 3 houses, only one of them met all my personal requirements.
This is what I look for:
1. A vintage feel and that the integrity of an older home has been preserved.
2. Lots of natural light.
3. Space (even a small house can have space.)
4. Serenity--I want my house to always have a cozy, welcoming feeling for myself and others.
5. A good floor plan--public areas on one side (living room, kitchen, family room, dining room) and private areas on the other (bedrooms, bathrooms, hallways.) If it is a 2-story house, then public down below and private upstairs, which most 2-stories naturally accomplish.
6. The house and decorating aren't trying to be more than they are--have you ever seen an older woman who dressed like a younger woman? Picture a house trying to do the same thing, whether it is decorated more modern or more ostentatious than necessary. There needs to be a feeling of consistency with the house.
Fortunately, my house (again, in my opinion) has 1-6. The ones today? Well, you be the judge.
HOUSE #1
This house is the one that got me to go see these open houses in the first place. I walk by it all the time with my dog and have always loved it, especially the turreted chimney. Asking price? A cool $3,650,000. No, that's not a type-o. This is Southern CA, and the house is in San Marino.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2360f/2360f74a984c0720afe35df92e9e6dee31f42c4d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bc0b/3bc0b10f73709b2e8ef6dea06a0813a9df8f7d13" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d0ff/5d0ff16ae3c8a55fcd44a054e38d8c6da8af28c6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7428a/7428af80440d268d49041a18315d8e75992d0002" alt=""
HOUSE #2
Just down the street from House 1 was this lovely Spanish style home built in 1928. You can move in here for a mere $1,450,000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/828b5/828b54383cb22c80856e00bdc0afabded2e9c224" alt=""
The winner of the day.
And then there was HOUSE #3, in Alhambra, going for $799,000 (overpriced, IMHO):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c430/7c4303ebeea262123ed767910cc9dfb412fd896f" alt=""
You walk into the front door and you're in the living room, which gives way to the dining area (not a room, because they all share the same space.) On the left side of the living room there are 2 rooms and on the right side of the living room there are 2 rooms. The ones on the left are both bedrooms. One has an adjoining bathroom. The rooms on the right are a bedroom, with another bathroom, and the other one is the kitchen with an adjoining laundry room. And that's it--no family room, no entry hall, no hallway. It actually felt like a giant hotel suite, not like a house. And, like House #1, a staging company had come in and prepped the house for showing.
So there you go. 3 houses, 3 opinions, and only one really hitting the mark. All of them interesting!
No comments:
Post a Comment